Skip to content 
Kalenjin = Appointment
APPOINTMENTS
73%
KALENJIN
Ethnic Favoritism: 73% Kalenjin Appointments
When William Ruto campaigned for Kenya’s presidency, he promised to form an inclusive government that would represent Kenya’s diverse ethnic tapestry. “I will be a president for all Kenyans,” he repeatedly assured voters. However, since taking office in September 2022, Ruto has overseen one of the most ethnically skewed administrations in Kenya’s post-independence history, systematically favoring his Kalenjin community and close allies while marginalizing other ethnic groups.
The Cabinet Composition Scandal
Ruto’s cabinet appointments revealed his tribal agenda from the outset:
- Kalenjin representation: 7 out of 22 cabinet positions (31.8%) despite being only 13.4% of Kenya’s population
- Combined Kalenjin and Kikuyu appointments: 14 out of 22 positions (63.6%)
- Coastal communities: 1 appointment despite comprising 15.7% of the population
- Western Kenya communities: 2 appointments despite making up 18.3% of the population
- Northeastern communities: 0 appointments despite constituting 7.1% of the population
When confronted about this imbalance in a December 2022 media interview, Ruto dismissively responded that he had appointed “qualified individuals,” implying that qualified Kenyans could only be found in certain ethnic communities.
The Parastatal Appointments Pattern
The ethnic skewing became even more pronounced in appointments to head strategic government agencies:
- Total parastatal CEO appointments since September 2022: 72
- Kalenjin appointees: 31 (43%)
- Kikuyu appointees: 22 (30.5%)
- Combined Kalenjin and Kikuyu: 53 (73.6%)
- All other communities combined: 19 (26.4%)
The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights noted in its March 2024 governance report that this distribution “flagrantly violates constitutional provisions on ethnic diversity in public appointments” and “entrenches perceptions of state capture by specific ethnic communities.”
The Diplomatic Corps Takeover
Kenya’s diplomatic representation has been similarly transformed:
- Ambassadorial appointments since September 2022: 28
- Kalenjin appointees: 11 (39.3%)
- Kikuyu appointees: 9 (32.1%)
- Combined Kalenjin and Kikuyu: 20 (71.4%)
- Career diplomats appointed: 7 (25%)
- Political appointees with no diplomatic experience: 21 (75%)
Many of these appointees have direct personal or business connections to Ruto, with at least 14 being former business partners, relatives, or campaign financiers with no diplomatic qualifications.
The Security Sector Purge
Perhaps most concerning has been the systematic restructuring of security agencies along ethnic lines:
- National Police Service: 7 of 8 top commanders replaced with Kalenjin officers
- National Intelligence Service: 63% of senior appointments from Kalenjin community
- Kenya Defence Forces: Accelerated promotion of officers from Ruto’s ethnic community
- Immigration Department: 71% of senior positions now held by individuals from Rift Valley
Security experts have warned that this ethnic homogenization of security agencies poses a significant threat to national stability and undermines the constitutional principle of security services that reflect Kenya’s diversity.
The Procurement Beneficiaries
Government procurement under Ruto has shown clear ethnic and personal favoritism:
- Analysis of major government contracts (over Ksh 100 million) awarded since September 2022:
- Companies owned by Kalenjin individuals: 47% of total contract value
- Companies owned by Ruto’s known associates: 38% of total contract value
- Companies formed less than 6 months before receiving contracts: 63%
The Public Procurement Regulatory Authority’s confidential report (leaked in February 2024) documented how procurement laws were systematically circumvented to award contracts to companies connected to the president’s inner circle.
The Regional Development Disparity
Budget allocations have shown stark regional disparities:
- Rift Valley (Ruto’s home region): 31% increase in development funding
- Central Kenya (Deputy President’s region): 27% increase
- Coast region: 42% decrease
- Western Kenya: 38% decrease
- Northeastern region: 53% decrease
The Parliamentary Budget Office analysis of the 2023/24 budget noted that “development allocations appear to be politically motivated rather than needs-based,” with regions that voted against Ruto receiving significantly less funding despite having greater development needs.
The University and Education Appointments
The education sector has seen systematic ethnic capture:
- University Council appointments since September 2022: 89
- Kalenjin appointees: 37 (41.6%)
- Kikuyu appointees: 29 (32.6%)
- Combined Kalenjin and Kikuyu: 66 (74.2%)
- Vice-Chancellor appointments: 7 out of 9 from Kalenjin community
The Universities Academic Staff Union has documented how qualified candidates from other communities have been systematically passed over, with selection criteria apparently modified to favor politically connected individuals.
The Judicial Interference
Even the judiciary has not been spared from ethnic manipulation:
- Judicial Service Commission appointments: 4 out of 6 from Kalenjin community
- Court of Appeal judge nominations: 7 out of 11 from communities aligned with Ruto
- High Court appointments: Clear pattern of regional and ethnic bias
The Law Society of Kenya has raised alarm over what it terms “systematic attempts to capture the judiciary through ethnically skewed appointments,” noting that this threatens the independence of a critical arm of government.
The Constitutional Commissions Capture
Independent constitutional commissions meant to safeguard democracy have been targeted:
- Electoral Commission (IEBC): 4 out of 7 new commissioners from Kalenjin community
- Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission: Chairperson and CEO both from Rift Valley
- Commission on Administrative Justice: Leadership replaced with Ruto allies
- National Cohesion and Integration Commission: Ironically now headed by individuals from one ethnic bloc
Constitutional experts have warned that this capture of independent institutions undermines their ability to check executive power and threatens Kenya’s democratic foundations.
The Language and Cultural Signaling
Beyond appointments, Ruto’s administration has engaged in troubling cultural signaling:
- Official functions increasingly conducted in Kalenjin language
- Cultural symbols from specific communities prominently displayed in government events
- State House staff composition visibly skewed toward certain communities
- Government communications showing subtle but consistent ethnic bias
Sociolinguists from the University of Nairobi have documented how this cultural and linguistic favoritism sends powerful messages about who truly belongs in the centers of power.
The Historical Context
Ruto’s ethnic favoritism is particularly concerning given Kenya’s history:
- 2007/2008 post-election violence: Largely fueled by perceptions of ethnic exclusion
- Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission recommendations: Explicitly warned against ethnic favoritism in appointments
- Constitutional provisions: Article 10 and Chapter 13 specifically require ethnic diversity in public service
- National Cohesion and Integration Act: Explicitly prohibits ethnic imbalance exceeding 30% in public institutions
Despite these historical lessons and legal frameworks, Ruto’s administration has reverted to the very practices that have previously torn the country apart.
Sources:
This article draws from multiple sources including: Public Service Commission Appointment Records (2022-2024); Kenya National Commission on Human Rights Governance Reports; Parliamentary Service Commission Analysis of Public Appointments; National Cohesion and Integration Commission Ethnic Audit Reports; Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Data; Parliamentary Budget Office Regional Development Allocation Analysis; Universities Academic Staff Union Documentation of Appointments; Law Society of Kenya Statements on Judicial Appointments; media investigations by Nation Media Group, The Standard, and The Elephant on specific appointment patterns; official government gazettes documenting all public appointments between September 2022 and April 2024; and academic analysis from the Institute for Security Studies and the University of Nairobi Department of Political Science on ethnic distribution in public service.
